Douglas Krantz - Technical Writer - Describing How It Works
Go to the Fire Alarm Home Page of Douglas Krantz -- Describing How It Works
Go to the Fire Alarm Operation Map Page of Douglas Krantz - Technical Writer
Go to the General Electrical Map Page of Douglas Krantz - Technical Writer
Go to the Fire Alarm Description Map Page of Douglas Krantz - Technical Writer
Go to the Fire Alarm Installing Map Page of Douglas Krantz - Technical Writer
Go to the Fire Alarm Maintaining Map Page of Douglas Krantz - Technical Writer
Go to the Fire Alarm Testing Map Page of Douglas Krantz - Technical Writer
Go to the Fire Suppression Map Page of Douglas Krantz - Technical Writer
Go to the Science Article Map Page of Douglas Krantz - Technical Writer
Go to the Writer Home Page of Douglas Krantz -- Describing How It Works

Fire Alarm -- Installation

Adding a single horn or strobe to a circuit can be the addition of one to many that have been added
When adding a horn or a strobe, does one really know how many additions have been added before?
Douglas Krantz -- Fire Alarm Engineering Technician, Electronic Designer, Electronic Technician, Writer






Can a Person Just Add a Horn or Strobe?

By Douglas Krantz

In a building that has been remodeled and remodeled, when a fire drill is sounded, have you ever found that a few strobes are running slow or won't even work? Then, when troubleshooting, the supervision voltage at the end-of-line resistor shows a normal circuit?

These measurements may show the wiring to be normal, but something isn't working. What's going on?

The Box Supplying the Power Isn't the Problem

It's not the Booster Power Supply, or Signal Power Expander, or other Notification Appliance Circuit (NAC) power supply providing power to the circuit.

From the standpoint of the power supply, if too much current is being drawn, the internal safeties for the NAC outputs will turn off the circuit rather than overload the power supply. If any strobes or horns are working, the power supply isn't being overloaded.

It's the circuit itself, the wiring outside the power supply box, along with the number of devices on the circuit, that's having a problem.

Accumulated Changes

Probably, over time, with each remodel or addition to the building, what has happened is a device has been added or the wiring has been changed.

The thing is, as each addition has been made, the addition or change wasn't very much. However, when including all the accumulated additions and changes, they all add up to an overloading of the circuit.

I know, the circuits usually have been designed with at least 20% headroom, so adding a single horn or strobe should not cause any kind of problem. But, when the added wiring is included, and the additions to the same circuit have been done 10 times without proper documentation on any single addition (so no one knows what is really there now), the 20% headroom that was originally designed into the circuit just isn't there anymore.

Supervision Voltage Doesn't Show the Problem

Sure, the end-of-line resistor is showing supervision voltage. But do the math; very little current is used for supervision. No matter how long the wire or how small the gage of the wire, that small current doesn't provide much of a voltage drop on the wiring.

Supervision voltage only shows that the wire has continuity. Supervision voltage does not show how much voltage will be lost in the wires when they have to carry the current needed to run the horns and strobes.

The Additions That Have Been Made

There are four ways of adding horns and strobes to a NAC circuit.
  • Method 1 - Just add the extra wire and the extra device because under normal AC power conditions the circuit works now and it's just one more horn/strobe.
  • Method 2 - Count the number of devices on the circuit and make a guess that the NAC circuit will handle the extra horns and strobes.
  • Method 3 - Look at the original as-builts and using calculations make an educated guess that the circuit will handle the extra wire and the extra devices.
  • Method 4 - To make sure the circuit performs as specified, run a full 24 hour power blackout test, and at the end of the 5 minute activation of the horns and strobes, measure the voltage at the End of Line Resistor. Compare that voltage to the required voltage listed on the installation sheets for the devices. Write the results down for future reference (that's what documentation is all about).

Results of the Four Methods

Method 1 - As remodeling and additions to the building has been done, if devices have been added over time, one can count on Method 1 to have been used a number of times. Adding just one horn or strobe might in reality be adding one device on a circuit that already has lots of extra wire and three or four devices too many. When the system is running on batteries, this addition, along with all the past additions, will quite often prevent a strobe at the end of the circuit from working, or at best it may only flash slowly.

Method 2 - Counting the horns and strobes works if one can make sure there aren't any hidden in rooms close by. Usually this requires turning on the zone, making noise and flashing lights to make sure all of the horns and strobes on the circuit are found. Also, as long as the history of the building is known (and that includes knowing for sure that since the original installation nothing has been added), installing an extra single horn or strobe, along with only short wire runs will probably be OK, but it's really only a guess.

Method 3 - Here, as long as the history of the building is known, and as long as the original installer made sure the as-builts were fully updated to include the wire size and wire length, and the original design included plenty of headroom to allow for the addition extra devices... adding a device or two, using the proper calculations, will usually be OK.

As far as calculations go, whereas the specifications found in the NFPA indicate that calculations need to be done, unless the system is properly tested, the calculations only show a prediction... not a surety.

Was this
helpful?
Yes   No

The problem is that none of these methods can be counted on; they don't show whether the circuit works. None of first three methods use what is actually on the circuit. These methods also assume that no other company has had their fingers in there adding devices and wire.

Method 4 - Only by using method four can the circuit be documented to actually be within the specs of the NFPA.

Method 4 Works

All this is to say that to actually make sure the circuit works, by properly testing the circuit - live - making noise and flashing lights, under adverse power conditions, Method 4 is the only method that can be counted on.







Douglas Krantz

Describing How It Works
writer@douglaskrantz.com
Text
612/986-4210

View Douglas Krantz's profile on LinkedIn



Ask
The
Technician

Readers Questions



Short Circuit
Free Subscription
I'll Send You the
Twice-Monthly
Fire Alarm
Newsletter

Get Short Circuit


Articles

How Does Class A Fire Alarm Wiring Work?-- Fire alarm systems save lives and protect property. Fire alarm systems also break down because... Read More

Just What Is a Signaling Line Circuit (SLC)? -- The SLC (Signaling Line Circuit) is another way of saying Data and Power Circuit. Along with added power to run the sub-computers and their input and output circuits, it's a computer data-buss ... Read More

How is a Buffer Relay Wired Into a Door Holder Circuit? -- Like a door stop, a door holder keeps a fire door open. When smoke is detected, the door holder releases, allowing the door to shut. The door holder looks simple and innocuous enough... Read More

How Does One Find a Soft Ground Fault? -- Normally, we think of resistance like that of a resistor. The amount of resistance is built-in; no matter what voltage is used to drive the electrical... Read More

Can a Magnet Really be Used to Test a Smoke Detector? -- Smoke detectors usually have two ways of being tested. Smoke (smoke particles in the air, or some sort of canned smoke), and magnets (the activation of an internal magnetic... Read More



Electrical Flow


On this website, most references to electrical flow are to the movement of electrons.

Here, electron movement is generally used because it is the electrons that are actually moving. To explain the effects of magnetic forces, the movement of electrons is best.

Conventional current flow, positive charges that appear to be moving in the circuit, will be specified when it is used. The positive electrical forces are not actually moving -- as the electrons are coming and going on an atom, the electrical forces are just loosing or gaining strength. The forces appear to be moving from one atom to the next, but the percieved movement is actually just a result of electron movement. This perceived movement is traveling at a consistent speed, usually around two-thirds the speed of light. To explain the effects of electrostatic forces, the movement of positive charges (conventional current) is best.

See the explanation on which way electricity flows at www.douglaskrantz.com/
ElecElectricalFlow.html
.