Douglas Krantz - Technical Writer - Describing How It Works
Go to the Fire Alarm Home Page of Douglas Krantz -- Describing How It Works
Go to the Fire Alarm Operation Map Page of Douglas Krantz - Technical Writer
Go to the General Electrical Map Page of Douglas Krantz - Technical Writer
Go to the Fire Alarm Description Map Page of Douglas Krantz - Technical Writer
Go to the Fire Alarm Installing Map Page of Douglas Krantz - Technical Writer
Go to the Fire Alarm Maintaining Map Page of Douglas Krantz - Technical Writer
Go to the Fire Alarm Testing Map Page of Douglas Krantz - Technical Writer
Go to the Fire Suppression Map Page of Douglas Krantz - Technical Writer
Go to the Science Article Map Page of Douglas Krantz - Technical Writer
Go to the Writer Home Page of Douglas Krantz -- Describing How It Works

Fire Alarm -- Testing

Is it tested? If everything is disabled, what is really tested?
Disabling parts of the fire alarm system for testing means that the disabled parts aren't tested. Just for practicality however, some parts have to be disabled. If too much is disabled though, all that's really being tested is blinking lights.
Douglas Krantz -- Fire Alarm Engineering Technician, Electronic Designer, Electronic Technician, Writer






What Happens When a Fire Alarm System is Tested?

By Douglas Krantz

Once in a while, I can completely inspect a fire alarm system.
  • The system is local only; there is no monitoring company to disable (put on test)
  • There are no people around to get confused or greatly annoyed as I sound the alarms
  • The system is small enough; all I have to do is set off the fire alarm system, walk around, and see what happens
This kind of inspecting can't be done very often. Usually to perform the inspection, something has to be disabled.

Unrealistic Total Inspection

The only way that a fire alarm system can be accurately tested is to try it. That means:
  • Activate the manual pull station or automatic smoke detector
  • Listen to all the horns and watch all the strobes
  • Make sure doors close and all the building smoke control functions activate properly
  • Observe people as they leave the building
  • Watch the fire department arrive
Just to make sure everything works correctly, this procedure is repeated for each and every input device. To totally inspect the entire fire alarm system, that may be the real method, but it's unrealistic. (For instance, try doing all that in a large hospital.)

Most fire alarm systems aren't inspected quite that completely; most fire alarm systems are at least partially disabled before inspecting.

Realistic Partial Testing

Fire Drills

During an inspection, by performing a fire drill, the part about the occupants leaving the building can realistically be done only once. After that, people aren't appreciating the inspection. And of course, the fire drill can be performed only if the owners of the building decide they want a fire drill.

On-Test with the Monitoring Company

With every inspection, the part requiring the firefighters to arrive is disabled by putting the system "On Test". The monitoring company is told that when they receive an alarm they don't dispatch the firefighters. (When there's no fire, the arriving firefighters seem to get so annoyed.)

Even fire marshals, making sure their dispatchers get the alarm, don't make the firefighters arrive.

Balance

How much is disabled beyond that is a balance; it's a balance between an unreasonable total testing and not really testing the system.

Input Devices

To make sure they detect what they're designed to detect, input devices have to be tested.

Pull stations need to be tried to make sure that pulling the lever will activate the pull station and that the fire alarm panel goes into alarm.

Smoke detectors (which are really particles-in-the-air detectors) need to be tested to make sure they detect particles in the air and they put the fire alarm panel into alarm.

Other input devices on the fire alarm system need to be tested to make sure they detect what they're supposed to detect, and the fire alarm panel goes into alarm or supervisory and does what it's supposed to do.

Notification Appliances

The Notification Appliances (horns, chimes, speakers, strobes, etc.) need to be checked to make sure that when the fire alarm system control panel goes into alarm, they sound (make lots of noise) or light up. Also, the Notification Appliances need to be looked at individually to confirm that no one has blocked them with shelving or put tape over them to prevent disturbance.

Disabling Horns and Strobes

Often, during the inspection, the circuits for the horns and strobes are disconnected or disabled. It's a balance though, between testing the fire alarm panel's programming and its load capability, versus not riling up the occupants.

Disconnecting the circuits will prevent one from seeing that when all devices are attached, the panel is programmed right, and it doesn't overload. But hearing the full evacuation all day gets people annoyed and soon they ignore the evacuation.

This is a conflict. Unless the system as a whole is inspected, how does anyone know if the fire alarm system works?

Function Testing

All functions of the panel(s) need to be tested to make sure the panel(s) work(s).
  • Alarms detected and the alarms sounded
  • Supervisories detected and locally sounded
  • Troubles detected and locally sounded
  • Display works
  • Actions taken

Was this
helpful?
Yes   No

Walk Test

Walk testing is often used, but walk testing has its limitations. Basically walk testing is disabling the latching-into-alarm function of the fire alarm panel.

There are a few fire alarm panels that go fully into full alarm for a few seconds during the walk testing. However, most fire alarm panels use one set of internal activation rules for alarm, and another set of internal activation rules for walk testing.

In other words, with most panels, walk testing doesn't really test the panel's internal alarm rules. Too much is disabled in walk testing to know the whole system actually works. If possible, don't walk test.

Magnets

During fire alarm inspections, magnets are often used to set off detectors, but magnets are a "go-around" way of testing the fire alarm system. Magnets go around the detector's ability to sense smoke or heat. If one is concerned about the detection of smoke or heat, why use magnets?

Partial Disabling

Keep in mind, when inspecting to see if the life safety fire alarm system is working, the more that's disabled; the less that's tested.







Douglas Krantz

Describing How It Works
writer@douglaskrantz.com
Text
612/986-4210

View Douglas Krantz's profile on LinkedIn



Ask
The
Technician

Readers Questions



Short Circuit
Free Subscription
I'll Send You the
Twice-Monthly
Fire Alarm
Newsletter

Get Short Circuit


Articles

How Does Class A Fire Alarm Wiring Work?-- Fire alarm systems save lives and protect property. Fire alarm systems also break down because... Read More

Just What Is a Signaling Line Circuit (SLC)? -- The SLC (Signaling Line Circuit) is another way of saying Data and Power Circuit. Along with added power to run the sub-computers and their input and output circuits, it's a computer data-buss ... Read More

How is a Buffer Relay Wired Into a Door Holder Circuit? -- Like a door stop, a door holder keeps a fire door open. When smoke is detected, the door holder releases, allowing the door to shut. The door holder looks simple and innocuous enough... Read More

How Does One Find a Soft Ground Fault? -- Normally, we think of resistance like that of a resistor. The amount of resistance is built-in; no matter what voltage is used to drive the electrical... Read More

Can a Magnet Really be Used to Test a Smoke Detector? -- Smoke detectors usually have two ways of being tested. Smoke (smoke particles in the air, or some sort of canned smoke), and magnets (the activation of an internal magnetic... Read More



Electrical Flow


On this website, most references to electrical flow are to the movement of electrons.

Here, electron movement is generally used because it is the electrons that are actually moving. To explain the effects of magnetic forces, the movement of electrons is best.

Conventional current flow, positive charges that appear to be moving in the circuit, will be specified when it is used. The positive electrical forces are not actually moving -- as the electrons are coming and going on an atom, the electrical forces are just loosing or gaining strength. The forces appear to be moving from one atom to the next, but the percieved movement is actually just a result of electron movement. This perceived movement is traveling at a consistent speed, usually around two-thirds the speed of light. To explain the effects of electrostatic forces, the movement of positive charges (conventional current) is best.

See the explanation on which way electricity flows at www.douglaskrantz.com/
ElecElectricalFlow.html
.